85 F.T.C. 407
IN THE MATTER OF
BESTLINE CORPORATION, ET AL.
MODIFIED ORDER, IN REGARD TO ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
Docket C1986.
Decision, July 22, 1971
Modified Order, Mar. 4, 1975 [FN*]
Order modifying an earlier order dated July 22, 1971, 79 F.T.C.
107, 36 F.R. 17982, issued against a San Jose, Calif., seller
and distributor of household, commercial, and industrial cleaners
and waxes, and distributorships therefor, by expanding the order,
as to corporate respondents only, to include a more precise definition
and clarification of 'multilevel marketing programs.'
Appearances
For the Commission: W. J. Marschalk and Robert Galler.
For the respondents: Robert N. Humphries, Humphries, Berger,
Pitto & Pearl, San Jose, Calif., Joseph N. Cotchett, Hutchinson
& Dyer, San Mateo, Calif.
ORDER REOPENING PROCEEDINGS AND MODIFYING ORDER TO CEASE AND
DESIST
Respondents Bestline Corporation (incorrectly identified earlier
as Bestline Products Corporation) and Bestline Products, Inc.,
filed a petition on Dec. 6, 1974, requesting that this matter
be reopened and the cease and desist order of July 22, 1971, be
modified. Following negotiations with the Commission's staff
attorneys, respondents filed a supplement to this petition, one
that, with a slight further modification, is not opposed by Commission
counsel.
Section 3.72(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice permits
a reopening of a final order of this agency only upon a showing
of changed conditions of law or fact or that such reopening and
modification are otherwise required by the public interest. In
the instant matter, these tests are said to be satisfied in that
(a) the order in question is uncertain in scope because of a failure
to define a key phrase, 'multilevel marketing program,'
and that (b) this infirmity is illustrated by the fact that subsequent
Commission orders, e.g., GerRoMar, Inc., et al., Docket
No. 8872 (Oct. 15, 1974) [84 F.T.C. 95] and Holday Magic, Inc.,
et al., Docket No. 8834 (Oct. 15, 1974) [84 F.T.C. 748] employ
a substantially different terminology of more precise and different
scope. While inconsistencies between consent orders are generally
attributable to factual differences between cases and the giveandtake
of negotiation rather than order deficiencies that require reopening
and clarification, we are persuaded that the public interest requires
a modification in the instant case.
The petition before us having been filed only on behalf of the
corporate respondents, and a civil penalty action involving an
alleged violation of the order by one of the individual respondents
being in progress before the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California, we will defer any modification
of the order in regard to said individuals until such time as
an appropriate application therefor might be duly filed. Accordingly,
It is ordered, That the proceedings in the abovecaptioned
matter be, and they hereby are, reopened.
It is further ordered, That the Commission's order in said matter,
issued July 22, 1971 [79 F.T.C. 107], be, and it hereby is, modified
to read as follows:
ORDER
PART I
It is ordered, That respondents William E. Bailey and Robert W.
DePew individually and as officers of Bestline Corporation and
Bestline Products, Inc., directly or through any corporate or
other device in connection with the advertising offering for sale,
sale or distribution of household, industrial or commercial cleaners
or waxes or other products or of distributorships or franchises
in a multilevel or other marketing program or with the seeking
to induce or inducing the participation of persons, firms, or
corporations in a multilevel or other marketing program
in commerce, as 'commerce' is defined in the Federal Trade Commission
Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. Operating or, directly or indirectly, participating in the
operation of any multilevel marketing program wherein the
financial gains to the participants are dependent upon the continued,
successive recruitment of other participants.
2. Offering to pay, paying or authorizing the payment of any
finder's fee, bonus, override, commission, crosscommission,
discount, rebate, dividend or other consideration to any participants
in respondent's multilevel marketing program for the solicitation
or recruitment of other participants therein.
3. Offering to pay, paying or authorizing payment of any bonus,
override, commission, crosscommission, discount, rebate,
dividend or other consideration to any person, firm or corporation
in connection with the sale of any product or service under respondent's
multilevel marketing program unless such person, firm or
corporation performs a bona fide and essential supervisory, distributive,
selling or soliciting function in the sale and delivery of such
products to the ultimate consumer.
4. Requiring prospective participants or participants in respondents'
said program to purchase the product or pay any other consideration,
other than payment for the actual cost of necessary sales materials,
in order to participate in any manner therein; Provided, however,
That respondents may require or may suggest the purchase of specific
and reasonable inventories only, by any distributor, on the express
condition that respondents at the same time agree to repurchase
any unused and undamaged portion of an initial inventory from
any purchaser thereof at full cost less reasonable shipping costs,
if any, within 90 days from the delivery of the product at the
option of the purchaser; Provided further, however, That if inventory
costs reach $500 or more, within said 90 day period, then said
obligation to repurchase shall cease immediately upon participant's
tendering a subsequent order to purchase the product.
5. Using any multilevel marketing program, either directly
or indirectly:
(a) Wherein any finder's fee, bonus, override, commission, cross
commission, discount, rebate, dividend or other compensation or
profit inuring to participants therein is dependent on the element
of chance dominating over the skill or judgment of the participants;
or
(b) Wherein no amount of judgment or skill exercised by the participants
has any appreciable effect upon any finder's fee, bonus, override,
commission, crosscommission, discount, rebate, dividend
or other compensation or profits which the participants may receive;
or
(c) Wherein the participant is without that degree of control
over the operation of such plan as to enable him substantially
to affect the amount of any finder's fee, bonus, override, commission,
crosscommission, discount, rebate, dividend or other compensation
or profit which he may receive or be entitled to receive.
6. Using any multilevel marketing program which fails to:
(a) Inform orally all participants in respondents' multilevel
marketing programs and to provide in writing in all contracts
of participation that the contract may be cancelled for any reason
by notification to respondents in writing within three working
days from the date of execution of such contract.
(b) Refund immediately all monies to (1) participants who have
requested contract cancellation in writing within three working
days from the execution thereof, and (2) participants showing
that respondents' contract solicitations or performance were attended
by or involved violation of any of the provisions of this order.
7. Representing, directly or by implication, that participants
in respondents' multilevel marketing programs will earn
or receive any stated or gross or net amount; or representing,
in any manner, the past earnings of participants unless in fact
the past earnings represented are those of a substantial number
of participants in the community or geographical area in which
such representations are made and accurately reflect the average
earnings of these participants under circumstances similar to
those of the participant or prospective participant to whom the
representation is made.
8. Representing, directly or by implication, that it is not difficult
for participants to recruit or retain persons to invest in respondents'
multilevel marketing programs as distributors or as sales
personnel to work home routes or sell respondents' products doortodoor
or any other manner.
9. Representing, directly or by implication, that it is not difficult
for participants to ascend to a higher level of distribution within
the marketing chain.
10. Representing, directly or by implication, that all participants
in the respondents' multilevel marketing program or any
other sales program will succeed.
11. Representing, directly or by implication, that the supply
of available entrants or investors in the respondents' marketing
program is inexhaustible; or misrepresenting, in any manner, the
availability of such entrants or investors.
12. (a) Failing to disclose, orally and in writing, the terms
of this order to cease and desist to all present and future distributors,
salesmen or other persons engaged in the sale of respondents'
products, services, or merchandising programs, and securing from
each such distributor, salesman or other person a signed statement
evidencing receipt of said disclosure.
(b) Failing to make available on request a copy of this cease
and desist order to any participant or prospective participant.
It is further ordered, That the respondents herein shall within
sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order, file with
the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the
manner and form in which they have complied with this order.
PART II
It is further ordered, That respondents Bestline Products, Inc.
and Bestline Corporation, corporations, their officers, agents,
representatives and employees, directly or indirectly, or through
any corporate or other device in connection with the advertising,
offering for sale, or sale of products, services, franchises or
distributorships, or in connection with seeking to induce or inducing
the participation of persons, firms or corporations therefor,
or in connection with any marketing program or any other kind
of merchandising, marketing or sales promotion program in commerce,
or affecting commerce, as 'commerce' is defined in the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, do forthwith cease and desist
from:
1. Operating or directly or indirectly participating in the operation
of any marketing or sales program wherein the financial gains
to the participants are dependent upon the continued, successive
recruitment of other participants; Provided, however, That financial
gains offered or received in accordance with paragraph 3 hereinbelow
shall not be prohibited by this paragraph.
2. Offering to pay, paying, or authorizing the payment of any
finder's fee, bonus, override, commission, crosscommission,
discount, rebate, dividend or any other form of consideration
to any participant or prospective participant for the solicitation
or recruitment of any other participant or participants in any
marketing or sales program.
3. Offering to pay, paying, or authorizing payment of any bonus,
override, commission, crosscommission, discount, rebate,
dividend or any other form of consideration to any person, firm
or corporation in connection with the sale of any product or service
unless such person, firm or corporation performs a bona fide and
essential supervisory, distributive, selling or soliciting function
in the sale and delivery of products or services to the ultimate
consumer.
4. Requiring prospective participants or participants, in order
to participate in any manner in respondents' marketing or sales
program, to purchase products or pay any other consideration other
than the actual costs to respondents, as determined by generally
accepted accounting principles, of reasonably necessary sales
materials and training relating to the sale of products or services;
Provided, however, That respondents may suggest, but not require,
that participants or prospective participants purchase specific
amounts of product inventory; Provided, That such suggested purchases
shall not exceed the reasonably necessary inventory requirements
of participants of the same level of distribution and status for
a period not to exceed one (1) month, based on the actual monthly
purchasing experience of at least fifteen percent (15 percent)
of the participants who have been engaged in respondents' program
at such level and status for at least six (6) months and who have
purchased products or services, either directly or indirectly,
from respondents within the past six (6) months.
5. Failing to repurchase any unused and undamaged products which
were purchased directly or indirectly from respondents by a participant
within eighteen (18) months before the voluntary or involuntary
termination of such participant at not less than 95 percent of
the net cost of such products to such participant upon the return
of such products to respondents or their designated nominee for
such purpose, freight prepaid.
6. Failing, clearly and conspicuously, to disclose on each product
or services order form and other documents utilized by participants
or prospective participants to acquire products or services either
directly or indirectly from respondents the following: Distributors
are not required to purchase any specific amount of products.
(Name of applicable business organization) guarantees the repurchase,
at 95 percent of net cost, of all unused and undamaged products
purchased within 18 months before a distributor's termination
and returned freight prepaid.
7. Using any marketing or sales program which fails to:
(a) Inform orally all new participants in such program and to
provide in writing in all contracts or participation relating
thereto that the contract may be cancelled for any reasons by
notification to respondents or to their sponsoring distributor,
in writing, within three (3) working days from the date of execution
of such contract.
(b) Refund immediately all monies to (1) participants who have
requested contract cancellation in writing within three (3) working
days from the execution thereof, and (2) participants showing
that respondents' contract solicitation or performance were attended
by or involved violation of any of the provisions of this order.
8. Representing, directly or by implication, or by use of hypothetical
examples that participants in any marketing program, or any other
kind of merchandising, marketing or sales promotion program, will
earn or receive, or have the potential or reasonable expectancy
of earning or receiving, any stated or gross or net amount, or
representing in any manner the past earnings of participants,
unless in fact the earnings represented are those of a substantial
number of participants in the community or geographic area in
which such representations are made, and the representation clearly
indicates the amount of time required by said past participants
to achieve the earnings represented, and failing to maintain adequate
records which disclose the facts upon which any claims of the
type discussed in this paragraph are based, and from which the
validity of any claim of the type in this paragraph can be determined.
9. Representing, directly or by implication, that it is not difficult
for participants to recruit or retain persons to invest in respondents'
marketing or sales programs as distributors or as sales personnel
to work home routes or sell respondents' products doortodoor
or any other manner.
10. Representing, directly or by implication, that it is not
difficult for participants to ascend to a higher level of distribution
within the marketing chain.
11. Representing, directly or by implication, that all participants
in respondents' marketing or sales programs will succeed.
12. Representing, directly or by implication, that the supply
of available entrants or investors in the respondents' marketing
program is inexhaustible; or misrepresenting, in any manner, the
availability of such entrants or investors.
13. (a) Failing to disclose, in writing, the existence of this
order to cease and desist and its terms to all present and future
distributors, salesmen or other persons engaged in the sale of
respondents' products, services or merchandising programs by mailing
to the last known address of each present distributor such written
disclosures and by securing from each distributor, salesman or
other person who becomes a participant in respondents' marketing
or sales program subsequent to the effective date of this order
a signed statement evidencing receipt of such disclosure. ('Present
distributors' as used herein shall mean those distributors who
have purchased products, directly or indirectly, from respondents
within eighteen (18) months of the effective date of this order.)
(b) Failing to make available on request a copy of this cease
and desist order to any participant or prospective participant.
It is further ordered, That for 120 days subsequent to the effective
date of this order or until the existing order forms presently
utilized by respondents are exhausted, whichever occurs first,
it shall be sufficient to show compliance with Part II, paragraph
6 of this order, to show that each order form which respondents
disseminate subsequent to the effective date of this order has
attached to it or stamped thereon the disclosure required by said
paragraph 6.
It is further ordered, That the corporate respondents notify the
Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change
in the corporate respondent, such as dissolution, assignment or
sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the
creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or any other change in
the corporation which may affect compliance obligations arising
out of this order.
It is further ordered, That the respondent corporations shall
forthwith, distribute a copy of this order to each of their operating
divisions.
It is further ordered, That the corporate respondents herein shall
within sixty (60) days after service upon them of this order,
file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in
detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this
order.
FN* Reported as corrected by order of Apr. 22, 1975.
FTC
85 F.T.C. 407
Main Page | About Grimes & Reese | Practice Areas | MLM Law Clients | MLM Articles
MLM Law Library | What Our Clients Say | What's New | Search MLM Law | MLM Law Blog | Site Map