multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
Articles

Guides and Reference Materials

Cases

Statutes and Regulations

SalesWatch Newsletter
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney

Slip Copy

In the Matter of

NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., CJM, INC.

CST MANAGEMENT, INC., and CK & C, INC., corporations

CLARA MCDERMOTT, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.

CRAIG TILLOTSON, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management,

Inc., and

CRAIG BRYSON, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc.

AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST

File No. 912 3071

DATE: May 21, 1993

The Federal Trade Commission having initiated an investigation of certain acts and practices of Nu Skin International, Inc., CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as "proposed respondents"), and it now appearing that the proposed respondents are willing to enter into an agreement containing an order to cease and desist from the use of the acts and practices being investigated,

IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Nu Skin International, Inc., CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., by their duly authorized officers, and Clara McDermott, Craig Tillotson, and Craig Bryson, individually or by their respective counsel, and counsel for the Federal Trade Commission that:

1. Proposed respondent Nu Skin International, Inc. ("Nu Skin"), is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Utah, with its principal office or place of business located at 75 West Center, Provo, Utah 84601.

2. Proposed respondent CJM, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Utah, with its principal office or place of business located at 1565 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106.

3. Proposed respondent Clara McDermott is an officer and director of proposed corporate respondent CJM, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, she formulates, directs, and controls the acts and practices of CJM, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in the draft of the complaint attached hereto. Her principal office or place of business is the same as that of CJM, Inc.

4. Proposed respondent CST Management, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Utah, with its principal office or place of business located at 11 Northridge Way, Sandy, Utah 84092.

5. Proposed respondent Craig Tillotson is an officer and director of proposed corporate respondent CST Management, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, and controls the acts and practices of CST Management, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in the draft of the complaint attached hereto. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of CST Management, Inc.

6. Proposed respondent CK & C, Inc., is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Utah, with its principal office or place of business located at 3800 Sherwood Drive, Provo, Utah 84604.

7. Proposed respondent Craig Bryson is an officer and director of proposed corporate respondent CK & C, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, and controls the acts and practices of CK & C, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in the draft of the complaint attached hereto. His principal office or place of business is the same as that of CK & C, Inc.

8. Proposed respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the draft of the complaint attached hereto.

9. Proposed respondents waive:

(a) Any further procedural steps;

(b) The requirement that the Commission's decision contain a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law;

(c) All rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest the validity of the order entered pursuant to this agreement; and

(d) All claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. s 504.

10. This agreement shall not become part of the public record of the proceeding unless and until it is accepted by the Commission. If this agreement is accepted by the Commission, this agreement, together with the draft of the complaint contemplated hereby, will be placed on the public record for a period of sixty (60) days and information in respect thereto publicly released. The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this agreement and so notify the proposed respondents, in which event it will take such action as it may consider appropriate, or issue and serve its complaint (in such form as the circumstances may require) and decision, in disposition of the proceeding.

11. This agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by proposed respondents of facts, other than jurisdictional facts, or of violations of law as alleged in the draft of complaint here attached.

12. This agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, and if such acceptance is not subsequently withdrawn by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.34 of the Commission's Rules, the Commission may, without further notice to proposed respondents, (1) issue its complaint corresponding in form and substance with the draft of the complaint here attached and its decision containing the following order to cease and desist in disposition of the proceeding and (2) make information public in respect thereto. When so entered, the order to cease and desist shall have the same force and effect and may be altered, modified or set aside in the same manner and within the same time provided by statute for other orders. The order shall become final upon service. Delivery by the U.S. Postal Service of the complaint and decision containing the agreed­to order to proposed respondents' addresses as stated in this agreement shall constitute service. Proposed respondents waive any right they may have to any other manner of service. The complaint may be used in construing the terms of the order, and no agreement, understanding, representation, or interpretation not contained in the order or the agreement may be used to vary or contradict the terms of the order.

13. Proposed respondents have read the complaint and the order contemplated hereby. They understand that once the order has been issued, they will be required to file one or more compliance reports showing that they have fully complied with the order. Proposed respondents further understand that they may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law for each violation of the order after it becomes final.

ORDER

Definitions

For purposes of this Order:

1. "Substantially similar hair loss treatment product or service" shall mean any product or service that is advertised or intended for sale over­the­counter to treat, cure or curtail hair loss and which contains or purportedly contains polysaccharides or any extract thereof.

2. "Substantially similar facial treatment product or service" shall mean any product or service that is advertised or intended for sale over­the­counter to remove facial wrinkles and that contains or purportedly contains albumin or any extract thereof.

3. "Substantially similar skin treatment product or service" shall mean any product or service that is advertised or intended for sale over­the­counter to treat or promote the healing of burns that would otherwise require skin grafting and that contains or purportedly contains aloe vera and/or avian collagen or any extract thereof.

4. "Competent and reliable scientific evidence" shall mean tests, analyses, research, studies, or other evidence based on the expertise of professionals in the relevant area, that has been conducted and evaluated in an objective manner by persons qualified to do so, using procedures generally accepted in the profession to yield accurate and reliable results.

I.

IT IS ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any partnership, corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from:

A. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of Nutriol Hair Fitness Preparation ("Nutriol"), or any substantially similar hair loss treatment product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, that:

1. the use of the product or service can or will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss;

2. the use of the product or service can or will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost;

3. the product or service is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss; or

4. competent and reliable data show that the product or service is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth.

B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any other product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, that:

1. the use of the product or service can or will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss;

2. the use of the product or service can or will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost;

3. the product or service is as effective as, or more effective than, any other product or service in the treatment of hair loss; or

4. competent and reliable data show that the product or service is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth,

unless such representation is true and, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

C. Advertising, packaging, labeling, promoting, offering for sale, selling, or distributing any product that is represented as promoting hair growth or preventing hair loss, unless the product is the subject of an approved new drug application for such purpose under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. s 301 et seq., provided that, this subpart shall not limit the requirements of Part I.A and B herein.

II.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any partnership, corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from:

A. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of Face Lift with Activator ("Face Lift"), or any substantially similar facial treatment product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, that:

1. the use of the product or service can or will permanently remove facial wrinkles; or

2. the product or service is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Tretinoin (currently marketed as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles.

B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any other product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act:

1. the efficacy of the product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles; or

2. that the product or service is as effective as, or more effective than, any other product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles, unless such representation is true and, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

III.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any partnership, corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, do forthwith cease and desist from:

A. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of Celltrex or any substantially similar skin treatment product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, that the product or service will promote the healing of third degree burns.

B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any other product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, that the product or servcie will promote the healing of, or is otherwise an effective treatment for burns, unless such representation is true and, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

IV.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any partnership, corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with the advertising, packaging, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any product or service in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

A. Making any representation, directly or by implication, regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any food, drug, or device, as those terms are defined in Section 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 55, unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

B. Making any representation, directly or by implication, regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any product or service (other than a product or service covered under Part IV.A. herein), unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation.

V.

IT IS ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., and respondents' agents, representatives and employees, directly or through any partnership, corporation, subsidiary, division, or other device, in connection with inducing or seeking to induce the participation of any person in any distribution, sales, or marketing plan, in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, do forthwith cease and desist from:

A. Misrepresenting, in any manner, the past, present, or future profits, earnings, income, or sales from such participation; and

B. Representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, by use of hypothetical examples or otherwise, that distributors earn or achieve from such participation any stated amount of profits, earnings, income, or sales in excess of the average profits, earnings, income, or sales of all distributors in any time period respondents may select, unless in conjunction therewith such average profits, earnings, income, or sales are clearly and conspicuously disclosed, and the percent of all distributors who actually achieved such stated profits, earnings, income, or sales in such time period is clearly and conspicuously disclosed.

VI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Nu Skin shall:

A. Within thirty (30) days from the effective date of this Order deliver a dated and signed notification letter in the form set forth in Appendix A to this Order to each of its current officers, agents, representatives, employees, and distributors.

B. For a period of five (5) years from the effective date of this Order deliver signed notification letter in the form set forth in Appendix A to this Order to each of its future officers, agents, representatives, employees, and distributors within three (3) days after the person assumes such position. Respondent Nu Skin shall be in compliance with this subparagraph with respect to notifying future distributors if such notification letter is included in each starter kit provided to each future distributor.

C. Institute a reasonable program of continuing surveillance adequate to reveal whether the practices of each person described in Part VI.A. and B. conform to the requirements of this Order, and promptly investigate any complaints about any such person received by Nu Skin and maintain records of any such complaint, investigation and disposition of the complaint for five (5) years from the date of the complaint, such records to be furnished to the Commission upon request.

D. Discontinue dealing with any person described in Part VI.A. and B:

1. who engages in the acts or practices prohibited by Parts I.A., II.A. or III.A. of this Order; or

2. once respondent Nu Skin has actual knowledge, or knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances, that such person is engaged in acts or practices prohibited by any other part of this Order, unless such person immediately ceases engaging in such acts or practices.

VII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., CK & C, Inc., Clara McDermott, Craig Tillotson, and Craig Bryson shall:

A. Within thirty (30) days from the effective date of this Order deliver a dated and signed notification letter in the form set forth in Appendix A to this Order to each of their officers, agents, representatives, employees, and present distributors, other than those persons whom Nu Skin is required to notify pursuant to Part VI.A and B above.

B. For a period of five (5) years from the effective date of this Order deliver a dated and signed notification letter in the form set forth in Appendix A to this Order to each of their future officers, agents, representatives, employees, and distributors who are engaged in the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale or distribution of any food, drug, device or cosmetic within the meaning of Section 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 55, or who are engaged in any multilevel marketing plan or business, other than those persons whom Nu Skin is required to notify pursuant to Part VI.A and B above, within three (3) days after the person assumes such position.

VIII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall, within sixty (60) days after service of this Order, and at such other times as the Federal Trade Commission may require, file with the Commission a report, in writing, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which they have complied with this Order.

IX.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., shall notify the Federal Trade Commission at least thirty (30) days prior to any proposed change in their corporate structures, including but not limited to dissolution, assignment or sale resulting in the emergence of a successor corporation, the creation or dissolution of subsidiaries or affiliates, the planned filing of a bankruptcy petition or any other corporate change, that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order.

X.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Clara McDermott, Craig Tillotson, and Craig Bryson shall, for a period of five (5) years from the date this Order becomes final, notify the Commission within thirty (30) days of the discontinuance of their present business or employment and of each affiliation with a new business or employment. Each notice of affiliation with any new business or employment shall include the individual respondent's new business address and telephone number, current home address, and a statement describing the nature of the business or employment and the duties and responsibilities. The expiration of the notice provision of this Part X shall not affect any other obligation arising under this Order.

XI.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations, their successors and assigns, and their officers; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., shall, for five (5) years after the last date of dissemination of any representation covered by this Order, maintain and upon request make available to the Federal Trade Commission or its staff for inspection and copying:

A. All materials which come into their possession from a distributor or any other source that were relied upon in disseminating such representation; and

B. All tests, reports, studies, surveys, demonstrations, or other evidence in their possession or control that contradict, qualify, or call into question such representation, or the basis relied upon for such representation, including complaints from consumers.

XII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent Nu Skin, its successors and assigns, shall pay to the Federal Trade Commission, by cashier's check or certified check made payable to the Federal Trade Commission and delivered to the Regional Director, Federal Trade Commission, 55 East Monroe Street, Suite 1437, Chicago, Illinois 60603, the sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000). Respondent shall make this payment on or before the tenth day following the date that this Order becomes final. In the event of default on any obligation to make payment under this section, interest, computed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s 1961(a), shall accrue from the date of default to the date of payment. The funds paid by respondent shall, in the discretion of the Federal Trade Commission, be used by the Commission to provide direct redress to purchasers of the Nutriol, Face Lift, and Celltrex products. If the Federal Trade Commission determines, in its sole discretion, that redress to purchasers of these products is impracticable or otherwise unwarranted, any funds not so used shall be paid to the United States Treasury. Respondent shall be notified as to how the funds are distributed, but shall have no right to contest the manner of distribution chosen by the Commission.

XIII.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., their successors and assigns, and their officers, and Clara McDermott, Craig Tillotson and Craig Bryson, individually and as officers and directors of said corporations, shall pay to the Federal Trade Commission, by cashier's check or certified check made payable to the Federal Trade Commission and delivered to the Regional Director, Federal Trade Commission, 55 East Monroe Street, Suite 1437, Chicago, Illinois 60603, the sum of two hundred twenty five thousand dollars ($225,000). The respondents shall make this payment on or before the tenth day following the date this Order becomes final. In the event of default on any obligation to make payment under this section, interest, computed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s 1961(a), shall accrue from the date of default to the date of payment. The funds paid by the individual respondents shall, in the discretion of the Federal Trade Commission, be used by the Commission to provide direct redress to purchasers of the Nutriol, Face Lift, and Celltrex products. If the Federal Trade Commission determines, in its sole discretion, that redress to purchasers of these products is impracticable or otherwise unwarranted, any funds not so used shall be paid to the United States Treasury. The respondents shall be notified as to how the funds are distributed, but shall have no right to contest the manner of distribution chosen by the Commission.

Signed this 21 day of MAY, 1993.

NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. a corporation

BLAKE M. RONEY, President

75 West Center Street

Provo, Utah 84601

JOHN D. SHUFF

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

444 Market Street

Suite 2700

San Francisco, California 94111

Attorneys for Nu Skin

International, Inc.

CJM, INC. a corporation

JAMES MCDERMOTT, President

1565 East 3300 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84106

CLARA MCDERMOTT, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.

DAVID W. SCOFIELD

Parsons, Davies, Kinghorn & Peters

310 South Main Street

Suite 1100

Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

Attorneys for CJM, Inc. and Clara

McDermott

CST MANAGEMENT, INC. a corporation

CRAIG TILLOTSON, President

11 Northridge Way

Sandy, Utah 84092

CRAIG TILLOTSON, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management,

Inc.

B. RAY ZOLL

Zoll & Branch

5300 South 360 West

Third Floor, Suite 360

Salt Lake City, Utah 84123

Attorneys for CST Management, Inc. and Craig Tillotson

CK & C, INC. a corporation

CRAIG BRYSON, President

3800 Sherwood Drive

Provo, Utah 84604

CRAIG BRYSON, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc.

NICHOLAS J. FRANCZYK

Staff Attorney

MARY E. OLSON

Staff Attorney

ALAN E. KRAUSE

Investigator

For the Federal Trade Commission

APPROVED:

C. STEVEN BAKER

Director

CHICAGO REGIONAL OFFICE

APPENDIX A

Dear Officer, Agent, Representative, Employee, Distributor:

The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has conducted an investigation to determine whether Nu Skin International, Inc. ("Nu Skin"), and certain of its distributors may have engaged in acts or practices which violate Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 45, as amended, including, but not limited to, false and unsubstantiated product claims and earnings representations for Nu Skin products and distributorships. As a result of its investigation, the FTC has alleged that Nu Skin, CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; and Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., (herein collectively referred to as "respondents"), have made false and unsubstantiated representations in connection with the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, and distribution of Nutriol Hair Fitness Preparation ("Nutriol"), Face Lift with Activator ("Face Lift"), and Celltrex, and the recruitment of Nu Skin distributors.

As a result of recent discussions with the FTC, the respondents have agreed to a Consent Order ("Order") with the FTC. The Order is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of violations of law by any of the respondents. Pursuant to the Order, the respondents have agreed not to make certain claims for the Nutriol, Face Lift, and Celltrex products or any substantially similar products or services. In addition, the respondents have agreed not to make certain claims for any other products or services unless they can substantiate those claims. The respondents have also agreed not to make certain claims about the past or potential earnings of their distributors. Finally, the respondents are obligated by the Order to discontinue dealing with any person who engages in the acts or practices prohibited by the Order.

Specifically, the Order prohibits the respondents from claiming that:

1. Nutriol or any substantially similar product or service (a) can or will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss; (b) can or will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost; or (c) is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss;

2. Competent and reliable data show that Nutriol or any substantially similar product or service is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth;

3. Face Lift or any substantially similar product or service (a) can or will permanently remove facial wrinkles; or (b) is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Tretinoin (currently marketed as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles; and

4. Celltrex or any substantially similar product or service will promote the healing of third degree burns.

In connection with any other product or service, the Order prohibits the respondents from representing:

1. that the product or service: (a) can or will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss; (ii) can or will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost; (iii) is as effective as, or more effective than, any other product or service in the treatment of hair loss; (iv) is as effective as, or more effective than, any other product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles; or (v) will promote the healing of, or is otherwise an effective treatment for burns;

2. that competent and reliable data show that the product or service is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth; and

3. the efficacy of the product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles,

unless the claim is true and, at the time of making the claim, it possesses and relies upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the claim.

The Order also prohibits the respondents from advertising, packaging, labeling, promoting, offering for sale, selling, or distributing any product that is represented as promoting hair growth or preventing hair loss, unless the product is the subject of an approved new drug application for such purpose under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. s 301 et seq.

The Order also prohibits the respondents from making any representation regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any food, drug, or device unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation. Similarly, the Order prohibits the respondents from making any representation regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any product or service (other than any food, drug, or device), unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation.

Finally, the Order prohibits the respondents from:

1. misrepresenting the past, present, or future profits, earnings, income, or sales of any person in any distribution, sales or marketing plan; and

2. representing that distributors earn or achieve any stated amount of profits, earnings, income, or sales in excess of the average profits, earnings, income, or sales of all distributors unless in conjunction therewith the average profits, earnings, income, or sales are clearly and conspicuously disclosed, and the percent of all distributors who actually achieved such stated profits, earnings, income, or sales is clearly and conspicuously disclosed.

In addition to the Order's prohibitions, the Order requires the respondents to provide a copy of this notice to each of their current and future officers, agents, representatives, employees, and distributors. The Order also requires Nu Skin to discontinue dealing with any person who makes any of the representations for Nutriol, Face Lift, Celltrex, or any substantially similar products or services, that are expressly prohibited by the Order. Nu Skin must also discontinue dealing with any person who Nu Skin knows is engaged in any other acts or practices prohibited by the Order, unless the person immediately ceases engaging in such acts or practices.

If you have any questions or would like a copy of the Order, you can contact us at [______].

Very truly yours,

[respondent's name]

COMPLAINT

The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Nu Skin International, Inc., CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc., ("respondents"), have violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public interest, alleges:

PARAGRAPH ONE: Respondent Nu Skin International, Inc. ("Nu Skin"), is a Utah corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 75 West Center, Provo, Utah 84601. Respondent Nu Skin, directly or indirectly, profits and benefits by and through the acts and practices of its distributors, including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.

PARAGRAPH TWO: Respondent CJM Inc., is a Utah corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 1565 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106. CJM, Inc. is the managing partner of CCC Partnership, an entity comprised of CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc, and CK & C, Inc. CJM, Inc., directly or indirectly, profits and benefits by and through the acts and practices of Nu Skin distributors, including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.

PARAGRAPH THREE: Respondent CST Management, Inc., is a Utah corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 11 Northridge Way, Sandy, Utah 84092. CST Management, Inc. is a general partner of CCC Partnership, an entity comprised of CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc, and CK & C, Inc. CST Management, Inc., directly or indirectly, profits and benefits by and through the acts and practices of Nu Skin distributors, including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.

PARAGRAPH FOUR: Respondent CK & C, Inc., is a Utah corporation, with its principal office or place of business at 3800 Sherwood Drive, Provo, Utah 84604. CK & C, Inc. is a general partner of CCC Partnership, an entity comprised of CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc. CK & C, Inc., directly or indirectly, profits and benefits by and through the acts and practices of Nu Skin distributors, including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint.

PARAGRAPH FIVE: Respondent Clara McDermott is a first­line distributor of Nu Skin's products and distributorships, a member of the Nu Skin Distributor's Advisory Board, and an officer and director of CJM, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, she formulates, directs, controls or participates in acts and practices on behalf of CJM, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. She also receives commissions and other profits from the sales of Nu Skin products by herself and other distributors. Her principal office or place of business is 1565 East 3300 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84106.

PARAGRAPH SIX: Respondent Craig Tillotson is a distributor of Nu Skin's products and distributorships, a member of the Nu Skin Distributor's Advisory Board, and an officer and director of CST Management, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, controls or participates in acts and practices on behalf of CST Management, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. He also receives commissions and other profits from the sales of Nu Skin products by himself and other distributors. His principal office or place of business is 11 Northridge Way, Sandy, Utah 84092.

PARAGRAPH SEVEN: Respondent Craig Bryson is a distributor of Nu Skin's products and distributorships, a member of the Nu Skin Distributor's Advisory Board, and an officer and director of CK & C, Inc. Individually or in concert with others, he formulates, directs, controls or participates in acts and practices on behalf of CK & C, Inc., including the acts and practices alleged in this complaint. He also receives commissions and other profits from the sales of Nu Skin products by himself and other distributors. His principal office or place of business is 3800 Sherwood Drive, Provo, Utah 84604.

PARAGRAPH EIGHT: Respondents are engaged in the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, sale, and distribution of numerous different products, including foods, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, designated as Facial Systems, Body Care Systems, Hair Care Systems, Interior Design Vitamins and Nutritional Supplements, and in the recruitment of distributors. The respondents have dominated, controlled, furnished the means, instrumentalities, services and facilities for, and/or condoned or approved the acts and practices referred to below.

PARAGRAPH NINE: Respondents have developed a multilevel marketing plan to sell Nu Skin products through distributors to consumers. The marketing plan allows distributors to earn money by selling the products at a suggested mark­ up to consumers. Distributors also recruit and train other individuals to be distributors in the respondents' marketing plan. Distributors earn money based on purchases from Nu Skin made by these recruits and others who they, in turn, recruit to be distributors.

PARAGRAPH TEN: Respondents have established the marketing plan, and recruited distributors, for the purpose of promoting, selling, or otherwise distributing Nu Skin products and merchandise. Among other things, Nu Skin provides each new distributor with a sales kit that contains brochures, order forms, and other materials identifying Nu Skin, that are intended to be, and are, used by distributors in their sales efforts.

PARAGRAPH ELEVEN: Respondents have advertised, promoted, offered for sale, sold, and distributed: (a) Nutriol Hair Fitness Preparation ("Nutriol"), a topically applied non­prescription hair treatment product; (b) Face Lift with Activator ("Face Lift"), a topically applied non­prescription facial treatment product; and (c) Celltrex, a topically applied non­prescription skin treatment product. These products are "drugs" and/or "cosmetics" within the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

PARAGRAPH TWELVE: The acts and practices of respondents alleged in this complaint have been in or affecting commerce, as "commerce" is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

NUTRIOL

PARAGRAPH THIRTEEN: In the course and conduct of their business, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of the Nu Skin products and the participation of persons as distributors of Nu Skin products, the respondents and their representatives or agents have disseminated, have caused to be disseminated, or have condoned or approved the dissemination of advertisements and promotional materials for Nutriol, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits A through I. These advertisements and promotional materials contain the following statements and depictions:

A. "... we have a product that has been shown to grow hair in two to three months ... and there are absolutely no side effects." (Exhibit A.)

B. "... corrects abnormal hair loss in a high percentage of users. New hair growth is also realized in a high percentage of users." (Exhibit B.)

C. "... the 'treatment which cures baldness' ... 'baldness is conquered' ..." (Exhibit B.)

D. "I have about 20 percent more hair now than I did before using Nutriol. Moreover, the rate of hair loss is noticeably less than before I started using Nutriol." (Exhibits B and E.)

E. "To avoid FDA red tape, Nutriol is being marketed as a 'hair fitness preparation' ... All information points to Nutriol as being the best remedy available for hair loss. Even the highly touted minoxidil­­Upjohn Pharmaceutical's proposed hair restoration drug­­seems to have a lower percentage of success...." (Exhibit C.)

F. "At last ... effective products stimulate natural hair growth without harmful side effects.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The following is a comparative chart designed to help you review the benefits of the three proven effective natural hair growth products available on the market today.

NUTRIOL FOLTENE MINOXIDIL

ROGAINE

­­­­­­­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­­­­ ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Is it a Drug? No NO Yes

...

Success rate can be extended to 98% Up to 90%, Up to 63% Up to 35%

with professional help plus

Success rate at stopping hair loss 100% 75% Up to 50%

...

(Exhibit D.)

G. "Does Nutriol work? Crinos claims the following figures for its users:

TOTAL regrowth .... 16%

PARTIAL regrowth .. 74%

NO effects ........ 10%

(Exhibit E.)

H. "There has been a major breakthrough in a product that drastically reduces hair loss, and in many cases, actually regenerates new growth and thickens a person's natural head of hair. This product [is] known as Nutriol...." (Exhibit F.)

I. "... if a person is realizing abnormal hair loss and notices the hair thinning out, Nutriol really can help correct this problem and, in many cases, regenerate growth." (Exhibits E and F.)

J. "Stop Losing Hair ... Ask How" (Exhibit G.)

K. "Nutriol is a big time hair­growth product in Europe, where it is marketed as Foltene ... Does it work? Europeans and Nutriol's US distributors say it does." (Exhibit H.)

L. Side­by­side top or front photographs of the heads of various different individuals with the statements "before using Nutriol" appearing directly below one set of photographs and "after using Nutriol" appearing above the other set of photographs, and further contain the following statement: "In just seven months ... I am ... experiencing new growth all along my once receding hairline and in the crown area." (Exhibit I.)

PARAGRAPH FOURTEEN: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH THIRTEEN, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits A through I, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that:

A. Nutriol will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss;

B. Nutriol will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost;

C. Nutriol is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss;

D. Competent and reliable data show that Nutriol is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth.

PARAGRAPH FIFTEEN: In truth and in fact:

A. Nutriol will not stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss;

B. Nutriol will not promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost;

C. Nutriol is not as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss; and

D. Competent and reliable data do not show that Nutriol is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth.

Therefore, the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH FOURTEEN were, and are, false and misleading.

PARAGRAPH SIXTEEN: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH THIRTEEN, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits A through I, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that at the time they made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH FOURTEEN, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representations.

PARAGRAPH SEVENTEEN: In truth and in fact, at the time they made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH FOURTEEN, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representations. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH SIXTEEN was, and is, false and misleading.

FACE LIFT

PARAGRAPH EIGHTEEN: In the course and conduct of their business, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of the Nu Skin products and the participation of persons as distributors of Nu Skin products, the respondents and their representatives or agents have disseminated, have caused to be disseminated, or have condoned or approved the dissemination of advertisements and promotional materials for Face Lift, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits J through N. These advertisements and promotional materials contain the following statements and depictions:

A. "Their non­surgical face lift will actually remove wrinkles better than Retin­A." (Exhibit J.)

B. "Nu Skin's non­surgical face lift­­now this face lift is all natural. And it will actually pull wrinkles off your face better than Retin­A, with no negative side effects." (Exhibit K.)

C. "... a product that can roll ten years off their faces better than Retin­ A." (Exhibit L.)

D. "It increases the skin's tone and elasticity ... We can illustrate the marketing power of a product like our non­surgical Face Lift by looking at the history of a drug called Retin­A ... The year it was announced that Retin­A was also effective in easing lines and wrinkles off the face, sales of Retin­A increased ... Now Retin­A is a dangerous drug with significant side effects, available by prescription only. Our product is all natural with absolutely no side effects. Clearly superior to anything in the market today." (Exhibit M.)

E. Side­by­side front photographs of the faces of an individual and further contain the following statement: "GET RID OF WRINKLES! ... NON­SURGICAL FACE­ LIFT" (Exhibit N.)

PARAGRAPH NINETEEN: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH EIGHTEEN, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits J through N, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that:

A. Face Lift will permanently remove facial wrinkles; and

B. Face Lift is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug tretinoin (currently known as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY: In truth and in fact:

A. Face Lift will not permanently remove facial wrinkles; and

B. Face Lift is not as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug tretinoin (currently known as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles.

Therefore, the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH NINETEEN were, and are, false and misleading.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­ONE: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH EIGHTEEN, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits J through N, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that at the time they made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH NINETEEN, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representations.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­TWO: In truth and in fact, at the time they made the representations set forth in PARAGRAPH NINETEEN, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representations. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­ONE was, and is, false and misleading.

CELLTREX

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­THREE: In the course and conduct of their business, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of the Nu Skin products and the participation of persons as distributors of Nu Skin products, the respondents and their representatives or agents have disseminated, have caused to be disseminated, or have condoned or approved the dissemination of advertisements and promotional materials for Celltrex, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit O. These materials prominently feature side­by­side photographs of the leg of an individual and further contain the following statement:

"I received second and third degree burns to my legs ... They [doctors] said that I would need skin grafting on my right leg ... [and] that without skin grafting, my leg would be disfigured, tight and scarred in color, and that I would not have full movement near my ankles because the skin would grow back tight. At that time, the grafting seem to be the only answer­­until I was introduced to [Celltrex] ... [Celltrex] has been tested on burn victims with success in healing tissue. I started to use the Celltrex ... They postponed all three surgeries because all the skin came back in less than 90 days. My skin feels normal in texture and where they told me I'd never have hair on my leg, I have hair."

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­FOUR: Through the use of the statement and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­THREE, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisement and promotional material attached as Exhibit O, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that Celltrex will promote the healing of third degree burns.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­FIVE: In truth and in fact Celltrex will not promote the healing of third degree burns. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­FOUR was, and is, false and misleading.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­SIX: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­THREE, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisement and promotional material attached as Exhibit O, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that at the time they made the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­FOUR, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representation.

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­SEVEN: In truth and in fact, at the time they made the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­FOUR, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representation. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­ SIX was, and is, false and misleading.

EARNINGS CLAIMS

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­EIGHT: In the course and conduct of their business, and for the purpose of inducing the purchase of the Nu Skin products and the participation of persons as distributors of Nu Skin products, the respondents and their representatives or agents have disseminated, have caused to be disseminated, or have condoned or approved the dissemination of advertisements and promotional materials regarding the sale of the Nu Skin products, the profitability of being a distributor for Nu Skin, and the recruitment of still additional distributors, including, but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibits M, P, Q, and R. These advertisements and promotional materials contain the following statements:

A. "$14,000 a month ... $168,000 a year ... a lot of other people are doing it right now." (Exhibit M.)

B. "... on a part time basis [earn] a monthly net of $7168 ... that's $85,000 a year." (Exhibit M.)

C. "If you're not earning $10,000 a month or more We Need To Talk!" (Exhibit P.)

D. "... be one of the first 25 people I will help get earning well over $100,000 in the next 12­24 months." (Exhibit Q.)

E. "The people we start working with locally will earn in excess of $60,000­­ $80,000 their first year without jeopardizing their present income." (Exhibit R.)

F.

"Sales Organization Growth

Duplication

5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5

1 Mo. 2 Mo. 3 Mo. 4 Mo. 5 Mo.

5 25 125 625 3125

4000 Salespeople

Worst Case Attrition

75% (4000 x .25) = 1000

Remaining 1000

Worst Case Sales

$100/Mo. x 1000 Sales People = $100,000

Volume

14% Commission x $100,000 Volume =

$14,000/Mo.

$14,000 Per Month

$168,000 Per Year"

(Exhibit M.)

PARAGRAPH TWENTY­NINE: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­EIGHT, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits M, P, Q, and R, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that the amount of money represented by these statements is representative, or typical, of what individuals who become Nu Skin distributors will generally achieve on a monthly or annual basis.

PARAGRAPH THIRTY: In truth and in fact, the amount of money represented by these statements and depictions is not representative, or typical, of what individuals who become Nu Skin distributors will generally achieve on a monthly or annual basis. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­ NINE was, and is, false and misleading.

PARAGRAPH THIRTY­ONE: Through the use of the statements and depictions contained in the advertisements and promotional materials referred to in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­EIGHT, including but not necessarily limited to the advertisements and promotional materials attached as Exhibits M, P, Q, and R, respondents have represented, directly or by implication, that at the time they made the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­NINE, respondents possessed and relied upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representation.

PARAGRAPH THIRTY­TWO: In truth and in fact, at the time they made the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH TWENTY­NINE, respondents did not possess and rely upon a reasonable basis that substantiated such representation. Therefore, the representation set forth in PARAGRAPH THIRTY­ONE was, and is, false and misleading.

PARAGRAPH THIRTY­THREE: In the advertising, promotion, offering for sale, and sale of distributorships, respondents have represented that Nu Skin distributors can reasonably expect to earn substantial sums of money. Respondents have failed to disclose that only a very small percentage of distributors have earned more than a small monthly income. These facts would be material to consumers in their decision to become distributors. The failure to disclose these facts, in light of the representations made, was, and is, a deceptive practice.

PARAGRAPH THIRTY­FOUR: The acts and practices of respondents as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices and the making of false advertisements in or affecting commerce in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission on this ______ day of __________, has issued this complaint against respondents.

By the Commission.

SEAL

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

EXHIBIT A

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT B

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT C

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT D

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT E

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT F

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT G

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT H

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT I

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT J

b. Referral: Use center of influence list as above and if they buy the product ask for a referral. If they don't buy the product ask for a referral also. Always ask for a referral, and then get referrals from referrals.

Example: After the sale.

(Script)

You: I'd like to thank you for becoming a customer of mine, Jill, I know you'll simply love this skin care line. I really appreciate your help in getting my business started. I'm sure you know some friends who could also benefit from a great product like this, can you give me 3 or 4 names of friends or associates that I can show the line to.

Example: No Sale

(Script)

You: Gee Ann, I can understand how skin care is not that important to you, but I am sure you know some friends or business associates who are thinning or who it really bothers. I am really committed to make my business a success and I'd appreciate your help in getting it off the ground. Can you give me the names of 3 or 4 people you know who are thinning or balding?

Thanks. I really appreciate it.

c. Third party referral: If you are uncomfortable about approaching retail customers directly, or use third party referral. You are actually prospecting them by asking for referrals.

(Script)

You: Janet, Hi. How have you been? (small talk) Janet, guess what? I just started a new job with a marketing company and one of their products is a dynamic skin care line (or hair product, or nutritional line, or subliminal tape line). It's the most expensively manufactured skin care in existence in the world, and priced at less than Lancomb or Clinique. Their non­surgical face lift will actually remove wrinkles better than Retin­A. It's exciting. I wanted to ask you a favor. Can you give me just four names of friends or business associates I could show the line to, someone who would like to look 10 years younger.

Janet: That sounds great. I could use a product like that.

You: You could? Great! Let's set an appointment and I'll give you a non­ surgical face lift demo. (Set appointment) While I have you on the phone, give the names of the four friends that I can show this to also. (Call the referrals and use the same technique for obtaining more referrals.)

d. Video pass out: This can be used if you are uncomfortable with approaching people directly. Use videos to sift for level of interest in the product

(i) Skin care: Use "Opportunity of a Lifetime" video. (Available from Nu Skin)

(ii) Subliminal Tapes: Use "Subliminal Explanation Tape" audio cassette. (Available from Nu Skin)

(Script)

You: Janet Hi! How are you doing?

Janet: Great, what have you been up to?

You: Well I've been pretty busy. I just got involved with a company that markets some pretty dynamic products. Matter of fact when I saw one of them I thought of you. It's a

Exhibit K­­Audio Cassette

Exhibit L­­Video Cassette

Exhibit M­­Video Cassette

EXHIBIT N

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT O

A RECOVERY UNEXPLAINED BY DOCTORS

by LOU WAPP of MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN

(414) 462­2128

On July 8, 1988 I received second and third degree burns to my legs. Doctors told me that I would be bedridden for 6­8 months, not able to work or enjoy the rest of the summer because of the heat of the sun. They also said that I would need skin grafting on my right leg from the knee down, and that my upper left leg would be scared. This was very devastating to me.

What you see in the pictures is the debriding of the dead skin done by the nurses. Doctors told me that without the skin grafting my leg would be disfigured, tight and scared in color and that I would not have full movement near my ankles because the skin would grow back tight. At the time, the grafting seemed to be the only answer­­until I was introduced to NU SKIN INTERNATIONAL and their products.

On July 23, 1988 I was invited to a seminar, so I rented a wheelchair and attended. They talked about a product called CELLTREX made with AVIAN COLLEGAN. I was given a sample and started to use it. This product had been tested on burns victims with success in healing tissue. I started to use the CELLTREX on a small area of my upper right leg, and in three days I noticed what looked like little bubbles of skin forming on my leg. I was to go see the doctor on Monday because they had my surgery scheduled for Tuesday. When I saw the doctor he examined my leg and said there looked to be skin growing "and your leg may not need grafting, so we'll postpone the surgery until next Tuesday, so we can watch and see what happens to the rest of the leg. You will need grafting, but not as much as we first thought." I started to use the CELLTREX further down my leg now and the same thing began to happen. They postponed all three surgeries because all of the skin came back in less than 90 days.

My skin feels normal in texture and where they told me I'd never have hair on my leg, I have hair. My skin is already turning back to it's normal color in some areas, as you can see in the pictures.

I am thrilled with the results from CELLTREX and the other products. I have used the MaPCA MOISTURE MIST, and when the skin was all back, I used the REJUVENATING CREAM and the ENHANCER.

Needless to say, the doctors can't explain what happened, they are just as amazed and as happy as I am.

Thanks to NU SKIN products, I'm up and running..........

??

EXHIBIT P

TABULAR OR GRAPHIC MATERIAL SET FORTH AT THIS POINT IS NOT DISPLAYABLE

EXHIBIT Q

EXAMPLE: SCRIPT FOR YOUR "WANT AD'S" ANSWERING MACHINE

YOUR MAIN REACTION MAY BE ONE OF SKEPTICISM. LET ME ASSURE YOU I HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO WITH MY TIME AND MONEY THAN TO MESS AROUND WITH PHONEY ADVERTISING AND MISPLACED HUMOR.

BEFORE I CONTINUE, THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THEIR STANDARD OF LIVING SO IF YOUR ARE MAKING ENOUGH MONEY AND HAVE THE TIME TO ENJOY IT, OR IF YOU NEED A JOB THEN I SUGGEST YOU HANG UP NOW.

BUT IF THE THOUGHT OF BEING TOTALLY AND ABSOLUTELY FINANCIALLY FREE WITHIN 6­ 24 MONTHS PUSHES ANY BUTTONS, PLEASE KEEP LISTENING BECAUSE WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO HEAR IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE.

LEST YOU WORRY THIS IS NOT AMWAY, HERBAL LIFE, MARY KAY, WATER UNITS OR ANY OTHER SATURATED PROGRAM. WHAT THIS IS, IS A MOTHER LODE OF WHAT FINANCIAL EXPERTS NATIONWIDE ARE CALLING THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY IN THE LAST 25 YEARS.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE WHAT IT TAKES TO EARN 10,000 DOLLARS A MONTH BUT IF YOU QUALIFY, I WILL RECRUIT AND TRAIN YOU FOR WHAT PROFESSIONALS CALL THE FINEST NETWORKING MARKETING PROGRAM AVAILABLE TODAY.

THERE IS ONE CATCH. THAT IS YOU MUST MEET WITH ME FOR ONE HOUR FOR A NO PRESSURE, NO HYPE, FACT FINDING INTERVIEW. DURING THAT ONE HOUR WE WILL DISCUSS THE OPPORTUNITY. FOLKS THIS IS FOR REAL. YOU MAY THINK THIS IS A JOKE. SADLY SPEAKING FOLKS THE JOKE IS ON THOSE WHO WILLINGLY GIVE UP 40 YEARS OF THEIR LIVES BUILDING SOMEONE ELSE'S WEALTH.

THE FIRST STEP OUT OF THE RAT RACE IS LEAVE YOUR NAME AND NUMBER SO I CAN CALL YOU BACK. LET'S FIND OUT IF YOU CAN BE AND WILL BE ONE OF THE FIRST 25 PEOPLE I WILL HELP GET EARNING WELL OVER $100,000 IN THE NEXT 12­24 MONTHS. IF YOU HAVE THE COURAGE TO LEAVE YOUR NAME AND PHONE NUMBER AND PLACE YOURSELF IN A WIN/WIN SITUATION, IT WILL MAKE YOU RICH. THANK YOU FOR CALLING, PLEASE LEAVE YOUR MESSAGE AT THE SOUND OF THE TONE.

EXHIBIT R

TELEPHONE SCRIPT

TALK WITH EXCITEMENT, REMEMBER THIS SCRIPT IS GOING TO MAKE YOU A MILLION

DOLLARS!!!!!

AFTER SMALL TALK: F.O.R.M. (FAMILY, OCCUPATION, RECREATION, MONEY)

I'M WORKING WITH A BUSINESS CONCEPT THAT IS SWEEPING THE COUNTRY. WE HAVE ALREADY SET UP BUSINESSES IN CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, MINNEAPOLIS, CALIFORNIA, AND HAWAII (delete your area if it is one of these). BASED ON WHAT IS HAPPENING THERE, THE PEOPLE THAT WE START WORKING WITH LOCALLY WILL EARN IN EXCESS OF $60,000­$80,000 THEIR FIRST YEAR WITHOUT JEOPARDIZING THEIR PRESENT INCOME. I'M LOOKING FOR 5 KEY PEOPLE, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE ONE OF THEM, BUT I THOUGHT OF YOU FIRST. DOES THIS SOUND LIKE SOMETHING YOU'D LIKE TO HEAR MORE ABOUT?

You may be able to stop here and just get a firm commitment to get together, or you may need to give them some more information. If they need more information, DO NOT DEVIATE FROM THIS SCRIPT!!!! Remember, CREATE CURIOSITY, DO NOT SATISFY!!!!

HAVE YOU HEARD OF UPJOHN COMPANY? THEY HAVE A PRODUCT CALLED MINOXIDIL, WHICH HAS JUST RECENTLY BEEN APPROVED BY THE FDA. UPJOHN HAD ALREADY SPENT 2 BILLION DOLLARS ON THIS PRODUCT BEFORE IT WAS EVEN OUT!!!! HOWEVER, IT IS A PRESCRIPTION DRUG, IS ONLY 30% EFFECTIVE, AND HAS ALOT OF REPORTED SIDE EFFECTS. MEANWHILE IN ITALY, A 40 YEAR OLD PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY HAS A PRODUCT THAT IS OVER 90% EFFECT AND HAS NO SIDE EFFECTS. IT IS ALREADY THE # 3 SELLING PRODUCT IN EUROPE. IT IS FDA APPROVED IN FRANCE, ITALY, AS WELL AS GREECE, SPAIN, AND PORTUGAL. IT IS FDA LISTED HERE IN THE U.S. AS A COSMETIC. WE ARE WORKING WITH THE COMPANY THAT HAS EXCLUSIVE MARKETING RIGHTS HERE IN THE U.S. THE SAME PATENTED PROCESS FOR THE HAIR, ALSO HELPS EYELASHES AND FINGER­ NAILS. PLUS A ISOMETRIC FACELIFT THAT HELPS FINE LINES AND WRINKLES AND IS MAKING PEOPLE LOOK YEARS YOUNGER IN JUST 1 OR 2 APPLICATIONS.

I REALLY CAN'T TELL YOU ANYMORE, BECAUSE WHAT I HAVE TO SHOW YOU IS 90% VISUAL, IT WILL TAKE ABOUT 60 MINUTES. IF I'M COMPLETELY WRONG­­THAT'S ALL YOU'VE LOST, BUT IF I'M RIGHT, DON'T YOU OWE IT TO YOURSELF TO FIND OUT??

WE'RE GETTING TOGETHER TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF OPENING UP THIS AREA ON ______. SINCE I'M ONLY LOOKING FOR 5 KEY PEOPLE, I NEED TO KNOW YOU ARE GOING TO DEFINITELY BE THERE!!!! CAN I COUNT ON YOU BEING THERE? CAN I COUNT ON YOUR SPOUSE BEING THERE? GREAT!! I'VE GOT IT ON MY CALENDAR, DO YOU HAVE IT ON YOURS?? SEE YOU THEN!!!!

REMEMBER THE 4 C'S:

C­­COMPLEMENT!!!!

C­­CREATE CURIOSITY, DO NOT SATISFY!!!!

C­­CONTROL YOURSELF FROM ANSWERING QUESTIONS!!!!

C­­COMMITMENT. GET A FIRM COMMITMENT FOR YOUR APPOINTMENT DATE!!!!

Analysis of the Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment

The Federal Trade Commission has accepted an agreement to a proposed Consent Order from Nu Skin International, Inc., CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., and CK & C, Inc., corporations; Clara McDermott, individually and as an officer and director of CJM, Inc.; Craig Tillotson, individually and as an officer and director of CST Management, Inc.; and Craig Bryson, individually and as an officer and director of CK & C, Inc.

The proposed Consent Order has been placed on the public record for sixty (60) days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After sixty (60) days, the Commission will again review the agreement and the comments received and will decide whether it should withdraw from the agreement and take other appropriate action, or make final the proposed Order contained in the agreement.

This matter concerns advertisements and promotional practices for three Nu Skin International, Inc. products: Nutriol Hair Fitness Preparation ("Nutriol"), Face Lift with Activator ("Face Lift"), and Celltrex. This matter also concerns the advertisements and promotional practices for the recruitment of persons to be Nu Skin International, Inc. distributors.

The Commission's proposed Complaint alleges that the advertisements expressly or impliedly claim that Nutriol will stop hair loss, stimulate hair growth, and is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss. These claims are alleged to violate section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 45, because they are false and the proposed respondents did not possess adequate substantiation for the claims at the time they were made.

The proposed Complaint also alleges that the advertisements expressly or impliedly claim that Face Life will permanently remove facial wrinkles and is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug tretinoin (currently known as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles. These claims are alleged to violate section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 45, because they are false and the proposed respondents did not possess adequate substantiation for the claims at the time they were made.

The proposed Complaint also alleges that the advertisements expressly or impliedly claim that Celltrex will promote the healing of third degree burns. This claim is alleged to violate section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 45, because it is false and the proposed respondents did not possess adequate substantiation for the claim at the time it was made.

The proposed Complaint also alleges that the advertisements expressly or impliedly claim that the amount of money represented in the advertisements is representative, or typical, of what individuals who become Nu Skin distributors will generally achieve on a monthly or annual basis. This claim is alleged to violate section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. s 45, because it is false and the proposed respondents did not possess adequate substantiation for the claim at the time it was made.

Finally, the proposed Complaint alleges that the advertisements expressly or impliedly claim that using Nutriol, Face Lift, and Celltrex will result in physiological changes in the body, as well as cosmetic changes in appearance. These claims are alleged to to violate sections 5 and 12, 15 U.S.C. ss 45 and 52, because they are false advertisements which induced, or will likely induce, the purchase of drugs or cosmetics.

The proposed Consent Order prohibits the proposed respondents from representing, directly or by implication, that: (1) Nutriol, or any substantially similar product or service, (a) can or will stop, prevent, cure, relieve, reverse or reduce hair loss; (b) can or will promote the growth of hair where hair has already been lost; or (c) is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Minoxidil in the treatment of hair loss; and (2) competent and reliable data show that Nutriol, or any substantially similar product or service, is effective in stopping hair loss and promoting hair growth. In addition, the proposed Consent Order prohibits the proposed respondents from making these representations, directly or by implication, for any other product or service, unless such representations are true and, at the time of making such representations, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representations. The proposed Consent Agreement also prohibits the proposed respondents from advertising, packaging, labeling, promoting, offering for sale, selling, or distributing any product that is represented as promoting hair growth or preventing hair loss, unless the product is the subject of an approved new drug application for such purpose under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. s 301 et seq.

The proposed Consent Order also prohibits the proposed respondents from representing, directly or by implication, that Face Lift, or any substantially similar product or service, (1) can or will permanently remove facial wrinkles; or (2) is as effective as, or more effective than, the prescription drug Tretinoin (currently marketed as Retin­A) in the removal of facial wrinkles. In addition, the proposed Consent Order prohibits the proposed respondents from representing, directly or by implication, the efficacy of any other product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles, or that such other product or service is as effective as, or more effective than, any other product or service in the treatment of facial wrinkles, unless such representation is true and, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

The proposed Consent Order also prohibits the proposed respondents from representing, directly or by implication, that Celltrex, or any substantially similar product or service, can or will promote the healing of third degree burns. In addition, the proposed Consent Order prohibits the proposed respondents from representing, directly or by implication, that any other product or service will promote the healing of, or is otherwise an effective treatment for burns, unless such representation is true and, at the time of making such representation, respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation.

The proposed Consent Order also prohibits the proposed respondents from making any representation, directly or by implication, (1) regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any food, drug, or device, unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the representation; and (2) regarding the performance, benefits, efficacy or safety of any other product or service, unless at the time of making such representation respondents possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence, which when appropriate must be competent and reliable scientific evidence, that substantiates the representation.

The proposed Consent Order also prohibits the proposed respondents from, (1) misrepresenting, in any manner, the past, present, or future profits, earnings, income, or sales from participation of any person in any distribution, sales, or marketing plan; and (2) representing, in any manner, directly or by implication, by use of hypothetical examples or otherwise, that distributors earn or achieve from participation in any distribution, sales, or marketing plan any stated amount of profits, earnings, income, or sales in excess of the average profits, earnings, income, or sales of all distributors, unless in conjunction therewith such average profits, earnings, income, or sales are clearly and conspicuously disclosed, and the percent of all distributors who actually achieved such stated profits, earnings, income, or sales in such time period is clearly and conspicuously disclosed.

The proposed Consent Order also contains provisions requiring proposed respondent Nu Skin International, Inc., to discontinue dealing with any person who makes any of the representations for Nutriol, Face Lift, Celltrex, or any substantially similar products or services, that are expressly prohibited by the Order. Nu Skin must also discontinue dealing with any person who Nu Skin knows is engaged in any other acts or practices prohibited by the Order, unless the person immediately ceases engaging in such acts or practices.

The proposed Consent Order also contains provisions requiring distribution of the Order or a summary of the Order to all current and future officers, agents, representatives, employees, and distributors of the proposed respondents; record retention demonstrating compliance with the Order; and notification to the Commission of any changes in the structure of the proposed corporate respondents or the employment of the individual respondents.

Finally, the proposed Consent Order requires proposed respondent Nu Skin International, Inc., to pay the Federal Trade Commission $1,000,000, and proposed respondents CJM, Inc., CST Management, Inc., CK & C, Inc., Clara McDermott, Craig Tillotson, and Craig Bryson to pay the Federal Trade Commission $225,000. The funds paid by the proposed respondents shall, in the discretion of the Federal Trade Commission, be used to provide direct redress to consumers. If the Federal Trade Commission determines that consumer redress is impracticable or otherwise unwarranted, any funds not so used shall be paid to the United States Treasury.

The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment of the proposed Order. It is not intended to constitute an official interpretation of the agreement and proposed Order or to modify in any way their terms.

FTC






Main Page | About Grimes & Reese | Practice Areas | MLM Law Clients | MLM Articles
MLM Law Library | What Our Clients Say | What's New | Search MLM Law | MLM Law Blog | Site Map


multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney

multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney
multilevel marketing laywer and party plan attorney Idaho Falls, Idaho, Office ~ Kevin D. Grimes, Spencer M. Reese, Steven A. Richards
615 Hoopes Avenue, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401-6106, Tel. (208) 522-2600, Fax: (208) 524-5686
E-mail: kgrimes@mlmlaw.com, sreese@mlmlaw.com and srichards@mlmlaw.com

©2012 Grimes & Reese, P.L.L.C.
Grimes & Reese, P.L.L.C., is a firm specializing in the legal issues associated with the direct selling industry. Before using the information found on this site, please see our disclaimer.